Opponents of the development have also called into question the fundamental intent of the urban renewal, saying that the neighborhood does not need government interference. "This is not a ‘down area’ in need of renewal," said Greenstein. "We’ve got a lot of brand new growth."
Referring to a new hotel that is being built in the neighborhood, he asked "Do they build new hotels in blighted areas?"
"Think about yourself," pleaded Dave Wallace, another property owner. "If you owned a house and renovated it and made it your own, and then the city says they will take it away, how would you feel. They haven’t offered anybody a fair market price for their homes. This isn’t a rich or poor problem. Anybody can be affected by this."
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
- Brownstoner: The Duffield Eminent Domain Battle Continues
- Curbed: Downtown Brooklyn Eminent Domain Hearing Held Again
- mcbrooklyn: Second Hearing on Underground Railroad Properties in Downtown Brooklyn
- NY1: Brooklyn Residents Continue To Fight For Preservation Of Homes
“Acquisition of property is critical and necessary for Willoughby Square to move forward — and without Willoughby Square, much of this new investment, and therefore businesses, jobs and housing, will not happen,” said Joe Chan, president of the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership. You buying it?Mcbrooklyn did double duty by reporting on the new hotels going up on Duffield in Boutique Hotel on Duffield Street, and More Brooklyn in Brief Tuesday. Duffield also came up in New Holiday Inn Coming to Schermerhorn Street in Downtown Brooklyn (Brooklyn Eagle).
You might call it the borough of bedrooms.Abolitionist Place (a.k.a. Duffield Street) is the home to much of this economic activity:
With the number of hotel rooms in Brooklyn expected to nearly triple by 2010, experts predict the Borough of Churches could gain a new nickname.
Chains like Sheraton and Hyatt, and boutiques like the Hotel Le Jolie in Williamsburg and the W Hotel offshoot Aloft in downtown Brooklyn are expected to pump the number of hotel rooms from 1,200 to approximately 3,000.
On Duffield St., a 325-room Sheraton is opening across from a 176-room Aloft, a more affordable spin-off of W Hotel that will feature a glitzy, hip bar.
Monday, October 29, 2007
The city’s moving forward with plans to use eminent domain to take and demolish a handful of homes on Duffield Street and homes advocates say played an important part in the underground railroad. A city-commissioned study couldn’t confirm the buildings' role in the anti slavery movement and now officials want the area for Downtown Brooklyn development. Advocates say the homes are a key piece of the borough's black history. As Sherry Karabin tells us, they're taking their battle to the courts.You can watch it here, and if you want the broadband version, click here.
Plans for a boutique hotel on Duffield Street appear to be moving forward independently of the contentious eminent domain proceedings that may hit the Underground Railroad houses just a few doors down. A group of investors recently closed on the purchase of 237 Duffield Street for $9.5 million, according to public records.... The forthcoming “seamless blend of ergonomics and urbanity” still has a ways to go before it graces Downtown Brooklyn, though: The DOB doesn’t show any applications filed for the demolition of the VIM building at 237 Duffield.To read more, including user comments, click here.
The reality of these new hotels flies in the face of the justification for eminent domain in the area. Joe Chan of the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership was quoted today regarding the small park that he wants to build after destroying the Duffield Abolitionist homes:
Willoughby Square has always been the centerpiece of the plan, and is an important incentive to attract private investment....Willoughby Square will be 1.15 acres. That's a pretty small "centerpiece" next to all these new hotels.
Acquisition of property is critical and necessary for Willoughby Square to move forward — and without Willoughby Square, much of this new investment, and therefore businesses, jobs and housing, will not happen.
However, the developer has said that they will not build the parking lots under the hotels, because they are “too expensive,” and instead rely on a proposed city-built underground lot across the street. Kaufman is quoted as saying: “We are lucky that the city is building an 800-car underground garage across the street [at Washington Square Park]. We see that as an ideal situation.”
Well, it certainly is good to be lucky.
Track Data Corporation and Amber Art & Music Space — scheduled to open this month before the three Brooklyn entrepreneurs were allegedly first notified that the property they’re leasing was up for eminent domain — are among the occupants on block within the BAM Cultural District. The property on the third block, also within BAM, is a surface parking lot. The city plans to recruit private developers to build high-rise mixed-income housing with ground floor performance and arts space there.
City Councilwoman Letitia James said after the hearing, which she called “just procedural in nature,” that she suspected the blight study was created recently as the result of a legal challenge to first ruling in favor of eminent domain. “I did not see a blighted study in 2003,” she said, referring to when City Council was given the opportunity to consider the Downtown Brooklyn plan, including the use of eminent domain to realize that vision.
The advocates for the destruction of the Duffield Abolitionist homes were brave enough to offer a quote to the Eagle. Joe Chan of the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership had this to say:
“Acquisition of property is critical and necessary for Willoughby Square to move forward — and without Willoughby Square, much of this new investment, and therefore businesses, jobs and housing, will not happen,” said Chan.
Mr. Chan, you're such a fatalist! In case you didn't notice, there are skyscrapers going up all around Downtown Brooklyn. Several hotels are even shooting up on the same block as the Duffield Abolitionist homes. Apparently, the real estate developers don't agree with you.
Please, please, if someone is convinced by our friends at the Downtown Brooklyn Partnership, let us know.
The city's vision for a massive, multibillion-dollar redevelopment of Downtown Brooklyn ran into more impassioned objections Monday at a public hearing debating whether the city can destroy homes that may have been stops on the Underground Railroad.
The article touches on the fumbles that forced the City to hold a second hearing after Downtown Brooklyn advocates found fatal flaws in the first eminent domain findings:
Nobody spoke in favor the City's plans to destroy the private properties. For more, click here.
After the report was issued, the city pressed on with eminent domain action to take ownership of the Duffield homes and 40 rent-stabilized apartments nearby, as well as a few other businesses. But earlier this month, after a number of lawsuits had been filed, the Department of Housing Preservation and Development withdrew that eminent domain application. An agency spokesman said it did so because of a paperwork oversight and has since been refiled.
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Housing Agency re-does botched hearing
after legal challenges force agency to withdraw initial eminent domain findings
What: Press Conference and Public Hearing
When: Monday, October 29, 2007
9:30 am — Press conference with elected officials and community members
10:00 am — Public hearing
Where: City Tech Auditorium – Jay Street at Tillary in Downtown Brooklyn
Congresswoman Yvette Clark, Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries, State Senator Velmanette Montgomery, and City Council Members Charles Barron & Letitia James will join over 50 community members, preservationists and Black historians at a press conference and City hearing regarding the City’s use of eminent domain to take seven residences on Duffield Street, widely believed to be the sites of Underground Railroad tunnels. The City is also seeking to take other homes and businesses, including three rent stabilized apartment buildings on Albee Square that house over 40 low-income families.
As a result of legal challenges by Downtown Brooklyn advocates, the NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development withdrew its eminent domain findings for Downtown Brooklyn earlier this month. The City’s withdrawal was an acknowledgment that it had no basis in the record for its use of eminent domain. This abuse of the powers of eminent domain would have proceeded if the City hadn’t been sued. They are now trying to move ahead by adding a blight study that has never before been made public, though it was apparently produced more than three years ago. That means that the City Council approved the use of eminent domain in Downtown Brooklyn without ever seeing the document that justified it. This is just more evidence that in New York City the justifications for using eminent domain don’t matter; it is all a pretext.
HPD announced the new hearing in a small ad in the NY Post on October 17, 2007, yet they scheduled this new hearing without notifying all the owners of the condemned properties. Isn’t it their responsibility to make sure that this is an appropriate use of ED, and not to use this process to rubber-stamp a decision that HPD has already made?
Monday, October 22, 2007
The City will say the evidence connecting the properties to the underground railroad are inconclusive. It was called the Underground Railroad and not the above-ground railroad for a reason. It was illegal in the 1800s to assist runaway slaves. So it's outrageous for us to expect that there are going to be documents that say we are breaking the law with the Underground Railroad.To see the complete coverage, click here. To see all of the Freddy Brooklyn Roundhouse videos, click here.
Thursday, October 18, 2007
“Brooklyn is ripe for a luxury hotel,” said one panelist.
“Travelers are ready to see a different part of the city,” said another.
Brownstoner's article, by contrast, was titled "Brooklyn Hotel Buzz: Boom and Doom."
The Eagle did report on the destruction of parking associated with the City's plan for Downtown Brooklyn. As the article states:
The Parking IssueDuring a Q&A session, concerns about parking and the loss of some major parking lots were expressed....
With the Sheraton/Aloft, “we are lucky that the city is building an 800-car underground garage across the street [at Washington Square Park]. We see that as an ideal situation,” he said.
Very lucky indeed! Too bad the City's plans have led to decreasing parking– you might think that if the City hadn't encouraged the elimination of other parking lots that it wouldn't need eminent domain to build new parking... but I guess nobody raised that question.
(The Sheraton/Aloft hotels are rising across the street from the Abolitionist homes on Duffield, and "Washington Square Park" looks like an incorrect referrence to Willoughby Sqaure Park, the 1.15 acre grassy knoll that would sit on top of the site of the Abolitionist homes.)
Ironies abound in the Eagle article. For instance its says:
Gene Kaufman of Gene Kaufman Architects, who designed the combined Sheraton (with 325 rooms) and Aloft (175 rooms) on Duffield Street in Downtown Brooklyn. He believes travelers, especially foreign travelers are ready to see a different part of the city, are looking for a variation on their New York experience.
One might think the Duffield residents' plan for an Abolitionist museum would be a more attractive "variation" than the City's proposal of an underground parking lot.
The short notice of this hearing and the failure to notify tenants and owners flies in the face of the spirit of transparent government. Please contact your NYC Council Representative to request time for the public to prepare for the hearing.
The City made some sort of huge mistake leading it to rescind its eminent domain decision, and it appears that it doesn't want anyone to examine this mistake carefully or to see if it was part of a larger problem. Please stay posted for updates.
It's no secret that there's been an increase in use of the eminent domain power. High-profile projects that have resorted to it include Atlantic Yards, Willets Point in Queens, the Second Ave. subway project, the New York Times Building and Columbia's Manhattanville campus. All these takings have spawned a new term: eminent domain abuse.
This month, the city actually abandoned a plan to use eminent domain to secure properties for a parking garage and public plaza on a Duffield St. block in downtown Brooklyn - due to a technical oversight. Some of the homes were abolitionist homes involved in the Underground Railroad. While preservationists declared a victory, we're not really sure that the city is going to run away from this one just yet. In other words, another "blight" determination could be just around the corner.
UPDATE: Gothamist has appended its post with a statement that I emailed regarding the term "abandoned." The City has scheduled a new eminent domain hearing on Monday Oct. 29 to continue with its plan to confiscate the properties.
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
The Brooklyn Daily Eagle has published more details regarding the City's retraction of its eminent domain findings for Downtown Brooklyn. The eminent domain findings are required for the city to legally confiscate and demolish the Duffield Abolitionist homes and other properties threatened by the Downtown Brooklyn rezoning. In Withdrawal of Eminent Domain Findings Gives Hope to Duffield St. Preservationists, the paper reports:
Seth Donlin, spokesman for the city’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development, said a blight determination that included the 21 lots on three blocks in Downtown Brooklyn in question was prepared for the department by environmental consulting firm AKRF in November 2003. But it was mistakenly not entered into public record at last May’s eminent domain hearing, requiring the reversal of the findings and a new public hearing scheduled for Oct. 29.
He said the blight determination would have to be obtained by making a formal Freedom of Information Law Request before it’s entered into public record.
“It is something that was produced specifically for the proceedings for eminent domain, and there is a specific time for which it is supposed to be made public,” he said. “Unfortunately, because of some oversight, it was not entered as it should have been [at the first hearing in May].”
Track Data, a financial firm with 150 employees; a rent-stabilized apartment building that houses 40 families; a handful of parking lots; and Amber Art and Music Space are also at risk of being displaced. Attorney Jennifer Levy, who represents one rent-stabilized tenant, and Joy Chatel, the partial owner of a home allegedly involved in the Underground Railroad, said she doesn’t believe there were any specific blight findings. Levy said the original urban renewal plan for Downtown Brooklyn found blight in very specific properties, but was later expanded to include a general area deemed blighted. This may not be substantive enough, in the eyes of the court, to justify the seizure of personal property. “I guess we’ll have to see what they have that they haven’t produced.”“I was never briefed or given a copy of any blight study,” said Councilwoman Letitia James, a supporter of the Duffield Street homeowners.
The Nets arena is part of the larger Atlantic Yards project, and like Duffield Street, calls for confiscation of private property through eminent domain. DDDB helps explain the situation in Hakeem Jeffries Re-emphasizes Opposition to Eminent Domain:
Lawyer Levy clarified, after the Assemblyman's comments, that there are two separate eminent domain takings discussed by Jeffries: it is the City of New York (NYC Economic Development Corporation) using eminent domain condemnation in Downtown Brooklyn, while it is the State of New York (Empire State Development Corporation) using eminent domain condemnation in Prospect Heights for the Ratner plan.For more details and regular updates by opponents of the Ratner plan, visit DDDb.net.
We agree, of course, with the Assemblyman, though we are also against the abuse of eminent domain to build 4,180 luxury housing units, at Atlantic Yards to benefit developer Bruce Ratner.
Brownstoner reports on the hotel boom in Brooklyn, and suggests that it has peaked. Here's a paragraph about the architect of 2 of the 3 known hotels going up on the same block as the Duffield Abolitionist homes:
The credit crunch is going to cause “a bit of a shake out” for some hotel developers, said Gene Kaufman. The architect (who designed the two hotels slated for Duffield Street) thinks that projects "that don’t make sense won’t get built” as borrowers find it harder to finance their developments. And Chang said he’d personally experienced the effects of the crunch because lenders are now looking for 30 to 35 percent equity from borrowers, whereas two months ago they only expected 10 percent.For more, including 13+ reader-comments, click here.
For an older Curbed link on the third hotel slated for the block, click here. And here's a rendering of the project at 337 Duffield:
In an effort to develop the area, the City had selected AKRF Consultants to conduct a study of the importance of these buildings to determine if they merited preservation. AKRF concluded that it could not verify that the buildings were part of the "Underground Railroad" and therefore did not merit preservation. The buildings are now slated for demolition.Here is the full letter: page 1 and page 2 (JPGs)
Many questions surrounding the role of the Duffield Houses in the "Underground Railroad" remain unanswered, however. There are experts in American history who are convinced of the inadequacy of the AKRF consultants and have called for further research in their historical significance, especially since that area of Brooklyn has a documented history of strong support for the abolition of slavery as well as participation in sheltering slaves while helping them escape to safe havens.
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
UPDATE: You can hear the program by clicking here (mp3). Other WBAI archived problems can be found here.
UPDATE 2: Here is a transcription of the verbal statement made by Assemblyman Hakeem Jeffries opposing eminent domain both to build the Nets arena and to tear down the Duffield Street homes:
We now have a renewed opportunity given the hearing that is going to take place and the fact that the City has been forced as a result of the excellent advocacy by the councilwoman as well as the lawsuits that were filed by the able lawyers in this matter to go back to square one to renew our call at the highest level possible, to Spitzer and to ESDC, reiterating our position against the use of eminent domain, both to create a basketball arena as well as to tear down these homes connected to the Underground Railroad.
Monday, October 15, 2007
In an article about abolitionist activity in Brooklyn, The New York Times seems to lend sympathy to the plight of two Duffield Street property owners who claim their homes were once stops for fugitive slaves along the Underground Railroad. Noting that Weeksville, an African-American community in Crown Heights that thrived from the 1840s until the 1930s, was nearly completely demolished until preservationists managed to save a handful of houses, one Duffield Street homeowner said, “There’s no black museum in Brooklyn to celebrate the Underground Railroad … This is the house to do it in. It’s important that the children and all of the people can see what people had to go through to be free.”The Eagle is not known to be friendly to preservationists, but it sounds sympathetic to the Duffield Street advocates. To read more, click here.
A Sunday real estate supplement in the Post (that doesn't appear to be online) had a cover story on Downtown Brooklyn development, and there was an update on megadeveloper AvalonBay's 42-story, 650-unit rental tower slated for the chunk of land between Flatbush Avenue, Myrtle Avenue, Gold and Prince Streets. The project was announced in April, but the story provided the first glimpse we've seen of the building rendering, which is actually very stunning. Stunning in its monolithic ugliness, we should say.
A massive throng — well, let's say a spirited assemblage — of about 100 residents of Fort Greene and surrounding neighborhoods marched through downtown Brooklyn on Saturday, protesting what they say is the demolition of a traditional African-American shopping district to make way for high-priced condos. The marchers, organized by the Brooklyn-based Families United for Racial and Economic Equality (FUREE), chanted "Hell no, we won't go!" as they followed behind East New York's Approaching Storm marching band, which set off innumerable car alarms along Myrtle Avenue and Willoughby Street with its raucous beats.For the full article, go here.
Please join Council Member Letitia James, Families United for Racial and Economic Equality (FUREE), along with elected officials, community leaders, property owners, and supporters as they advocate for the preservation of historic buildings in downtown Brooklyn, and protest the abuse of eminent domain
This Tuesday, October 16th at 2:00 PM, all will gather on the Steps of City Hall for a rally in light of the City of New York’s recent withdrawal of its eminent domain plan for Downtown Brooklyn
(Brooklyn, NY) - In response to the Eminent Domain Procedure Law Petition filed on behalf of residents and businesses of Downtown Brooklyn, the City has rescinded its eminent domain findings and will hold a new hearing. This reprieve gives advocates of historic home preservation more time to use political pressure to alter the footprint that includes historic properties at risk of government condemnation.
“I stand firm with my Duffield Street constituents in protecting their historic homes, as well as the hallowed site of the Underground Railroad. The City’s objective to take these properties by eminent domain would lead to an unconscionable action with irreparable consequences. We can develop Downtown Brooklyn without sacrificing our history. Historic homes in Brooklyn should be preserved at all costs,” said Council Member James.
The Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD), has withdrawn its eminent domain determination because it failed to enter a blight determination into the public record. Now the public process must start all over from the beginning, including another public hearing on October 29th, and a 60-day determination period to follow. The community views the recent withdrawal by New York City of eminent domain use in Downtown Brooklyn as an interim victory for many hard working families, as well as business owners, who have resided on their properties for decades.
“My criticism of the Bloomberg Administration’s condemnation of historic properties is well known; I am especially critical of the seizing of homes that may have been involved with the Underground Railroad for the development of an underground parking lot,” said Council Member James adding, “I have filed an affidavit with the Supreme Court of the State of New York in support of Families United for Racial and Economic Equality and Joy Chatel. Both my constituents and I object to development that deprives future generations knowledge of this country’s history, and its involvement with the institution of slavery.”
WHAT: Press event to discuss the recent battle won against New York City’s use of eminent domain in Downtown Brooklyn
WHEN: Tuesday, October 16th, at 2:00 PM
WHERE: The Steps of City Hall
CONTACT: Amyre Loomis or Alfred Chiodo - (718) 260-9191
The Black Ice Project / Underground Railroad Announces an Association to Identify Significant Links with the Underground Railroad Duffield Safe Houses in Brooklyn, New YorkTo see this announcement of their website, please go here.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. BROOKLYN, NEW YORK 06/23/07.
Drakeford Levi of The Black Ice Project Committee... announced today an association with Joy Chatel of the Underground Railroad Duffield Street Safe Houses in Brooklyn, New York.
The association will be working in conjunction with the historians of SONAHHR, The Society of North Americans Hockey Historians and Researchers, in an effort to identify the original Quaker (Hicksites) and Black families who served as conductors and station managers of the Duffield Street safehouses in Brooklyn, New York.
Through identification and contact with descendants of these groups, the Association hopes to re-establish the historic links and organizational ties between these individual families and descendant families of runaway slaves who then settled east in the Black community of Guinea Town, Long Island and the Quaker community of Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, the last station stop on the anti-slavery Underground Railroad.
SONAHHR is currently researching significant links and organizational ties to the Colored Hockey League in Nova Scotia in the late 1890s to 1900s and the league's historic ties to the New York branch of the Underground Railroad. For more information on The Black Ice Project, SONAHHR, and the Colored Hockey League you can check out the following websites: www.theblackiceproject.com, www.sonahhr.com, and www.blackicebook.com
Sunday, October 14, 2007
You can also view the 9-minute NY Times video here. The Times coverage created a small wave of blog coverage:
- History News Network: On the Trail of Brooklyn’s Underground Railroad
- NoLandGrabl: On the Trail of Brooklyn’s Underground Railroad
- Vanity Dark: And now for a little Bklyn History
- Curbed: Friday AM Linkage
- captain_maybe: history/gentrification
Friday, October 12, 2007
The New York Times published an extensive article on the Underground Railroad in Brooklyn, which explores the Duffield Street homes, and their connection to the rest of Brooklyn at the time. To read the article and see the accompanying video, go to On the Trail of Brooklyn's Underground Railroad
The Times explores some of the context of Duffield Street:
The article mentions the failure to find conclusive proof of Underground Railroad activity:
From Plymouth Church, it’s a 10-minute walk to the corner of Fulton and Duffield Streets, where the new Abolitionist Place sign hangs. The abolitionists Thomas and Harriet Truesdell lived at 227 Duffield Street in the 1850s, and William Harned, an Underground Railroad conductor, lived near Duffield and Willoughby Streets.
Even as the city unveiled the new sign, however, it was considering plans to demolish the small houses on Duffield Street as part of an economic development plan for downtown Brooklyn. New hotels, underground parking and a public square would replace much of what now stands on the block.
While maintaining a sense of balance, the article makes a very strong case for further research into the historical significance of the Duffield Street homes.
Mr. Greenstein acknowledged that they have only circumstantial evidence. A planning and environmental firm commissioned by the city found no conclusive proof of their claims. The consultants made no attempt to excavate that mysterious tunnel, noting in their report that “assuming that a tunnel was discovered, there would be no way of knowing if it served as a passageway for freedom seekers without corroborating artifacts.”
Still, Mr. Greenstein said, “I think there’s enough evidence here to say, ‘Let’s do an archaeological dig.’”
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Todd Triplett and his two partners, Shaun Jenkins and Philip McKenzie, wanted to create a sort of modern-day Cotton Club right in the middle of downtown Brooklyn. And the three African-American businessmen were so in love with the idea of a do-it-yourself cultural revival, they put themselves in serious debt to make it happen....
Then, less than a month before the scheduled opening, a letter from the city arrived. Signed by a man named, ironically enough, Jack Hammer, director of Brooklyn planning, the letter informed them that the city was taking the building in an eminent-domain action.
Why? So Brooklyn could turn the building into condos and . . . a cultural center.
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
Guy Lotus Blog: State Historic Preservation Office Never Contacted About Underground Railroad Houses
The New York State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) had never made a determination on the eligibility of the Duffield Street Houses to the National Register of Historic Places, the country’s official list of historic properties. Not only has the agency not issued an official determination (according to their records), but agency staff was never consulted about the possibility of the buildings being eligible nor did it seem that the agency was ever consulted about the larger Downtown Brooklyn Plan…
“This is a major omission on the part of the City and their consultants. The basis of the Research Report is that these buildings should not be protected because they are not eligible for any kind of historic recognition - a point that the majority of the peer reviewers disputed. That the government agency who is tasked to make this exact determination was not even consulted seems negligent at best,” said Simeon Bankoff, Executive Director of the Historic Districts Council.
Families United for Racial and Economic Equality (FUREE) announced yesterday that they won a recent battle against New York City when they received news that they would not be employing eminent
domain to throw 40 families on the streets.
This block that the City wants to convert into a “underground parking garage and plaza,” is not only the home to low-income immigrant families who, if evicted, will be homeless, but this block includes homes that are, “widely believed to have been safe houses on the Underground Railroad and hotbeds of Abolitionist activity.”
The eminent domain withdrawal does not mean the fight is over for FUREE and these families, but we count this as a victory that the City will not be able to take away the homes of hard working families, who have lived in the neighborhood for twenty years, in the name of development.
The city Department of Housing Preservation and Development has rescinded its eminent domain determination for the two sites, although the agency is not backtracking from the city’s plans. Rather, HPD spokesman Neill Coleman said in an e-mail that the city had failed to enter a blight determination into the public record. That means the public process has to start over from the beginning, with a new public hearing, Oct. 29, and a new determination period. (The original hearing took place in May.)Read more here: Short Reprieve for Brooklynites.
Moreover, even though the City pulled back, it doesn't mean that they won't come back with the exact same demolition plan. But it does give neighborhood advocates another chance to argue that the Downtown Brooklyn plan has flaws that can be corrected. With all that in mind, here are links to the most recent blog coverage:
- The Real Deal: City rethinks Duffield St. demos
- Brownstoner: City Reevaluating Duffield St. Eminent Domain Plan
- Brooklyn Daily Eagle: City Withdraws Eminent Domain For Downtown Brooklyn Property
- mcbrooklyn: Duffield Street Underground RR, Norman Mailer and More Brooklyn in Brief, Tuesday
Monday, October 8, 2007
Prior to the fire, L.M.D.C. [Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, the public authority in charge of the World Trade Center site] officials had repeatedly assured residents the demolition would proceed safely. Over the years, Community Board 1, environmental activists and local politicians raised concerns over many aspects of the project including the L.M.D.C.’s hiring of a contractor with alleged mob ties, John Galt Corp.; falling debris from the building; and fire safety violations.
At the end of last year, the L.M.D.C. passed direct supervision of the Deutsche building to its subsidiary, the Lower Manhattan Construction Command Center and it has taken it back since the fire.
Last week, it was revealed that Charles Maikish, the former executive director of the Construction Center, wrote a memo in May warning L.M.D.C. Chairperson Avi Schick that Maikish did not have enough staff to properly supervise the project.
Saturday, October 6, 2007
This might be an important victory to those challenging the Downtown Brooklyn rezoning. Please stay posted as the situation develops.
Thursday, October 4, 2007
I’m concerned that your recent editorial got the purpose of the co-naming of Duffield Street as Abolitionist Place dead wrong (“Sad irony on Duffield,” Sept. 22)....
Also, I want to make it very clear that my office, and other offices of elected officials and community leaders, will not allow Mayor Bloomberg to simply make an empty symbolic gesture while it continues to pursue the condemnation of historic homes....
I thank The Brooklyn Paper for highlighting the history of the Underground Railroad in Downtown Brooklyn, and for all The Paper does in fighting to protect the soul of Brooklyn against overdevelopment.
Here is the Paper's editorial response:
We’re not sure why the Councilwoman thinks our editorial was “dead wrong” when she ended up agreeing with all its main points.
The Brooklyn Paper has done a great job covering the Duffield Abolitionist homes, but it made a mistake in its original editorial:
In a statement, several City Councilmembers said the co-naming of Duffield Street as Abolitionist Place “supports the homeowners on Duffield Street, and the preservation of their homes.”
It does nothing of the sort. In fact, it allows the Bloomberg Administration to make an empty symbolic gesture that will not stand the test of time.
By all appearances, Bloomberg wants to "commemorate" Abolitionist history anywhere besides this stretch of Duffield. The point of the co-naming was the connect the history to that specific block. Tying the history to this specific block will undermine Bloomberg's attempt to make "an empty symbolic gesture."
This blog has already been critical of Brooklyn Paper's editorial, and we posted about it here. More importantly, we all agree on the importance of this block, and these differences represent variations on the ways to oppose the Bloomberg plan to destroy the Abolitionist homes.
- A former LMDC employee was berated for talking about the safety conditions that lead up to the deadly Deutsche Bank fire. See TOWERING FEUD by the NY Post 9/27/07.
- LMDC denies ever hearing about the safety complaints, according to several articles, including Memo: Months before fatal fire, state help sought for WTC tower.
- In Firefighters Didn't Know Of Deutsche Bank "Escape Plan", Gothamist outlines how there was a plan that the LMDC had to deal with fires, but they just never bothered to make sure the Fired Department knew.
- The NY Times first reported on the LMDC's failure in An Escape Plan Stayed Hidden at a Fatal Fire.
“Elected officials are turning a blind eye to the fact that the Yankees seem to have unfettered access to the public trough,” Damiani said. “It goes to show how the Yankees will stop at nothing to squeeze every penny from New Yorkers for this project.”
In 2001, then-Mayor Rudolph Giuliani authorized the Yankees to deduct up to $5 million a year on planning costs for the new stadium for five years for rent payments to the city, Good Jobs said.
...and the subsidies for "rent payments" went for things like crystal baseballs, according to Good Jobs New York.
So the NYC EDC's plan to destroy the Duffield Abolitionist homes to build an underground parking lot is pretty much par for the course. So is the NY State ESDC's failure to hire an ombudsman for the Atlantic Yards, despite a promise made 149 days ago.
The Atlantic Yards is the most visible fight against public authority abuse, but it is part of an even bigger problem. Are New Yorkers finally getting some guts to fight for good government? The answer is up to you, dear reader.
Wednesday, October 3, 2007
In a surprise development, this newspaper has learned that Forest City Ratner Companies plans to build the largest residential building so far announced east of Flatbush Avenue.
It appears that no major variances are needed for this project. At 405 feet, the new building would conform to the height guidelines of 415 feet as set in the 2004 rezoning of Downtown Brooklyn.
Although the site is not technically within the BAM Cultural District, it joins the 28-story Forte residential building in the next block on Fulton Street.